VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 August 2006
Published in Vadose Zone J 5:978-989 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0003
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kung, K.-J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kung, K.-J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kung, K.-J.S.
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Preferential Flow
Right arrow Inverse Procedures/Parameter Estimation

Quantifying the Pore Size Spectrum of Macropore-Type Preferential Pathways under Transient Flow

K.-J.S. Kunga,*, E. J. Kladivkob, C. S. Hellingc, T. J. Gishd, T. S. Steenhuise and D. B. Jaynesf

a Dep. Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1299
b Dep. Agronomy, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
c Sustainable Perennial Crops Lab., USDA-ARS, BARC-W, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
d Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab., USDA-ARS, BARC-W, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350
e Dep. Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850
f National Soil Tilth Lab., USDA-ARS, Ames, IA 50011


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Normalized tracer mass flux breakthrough patterns. The open symbols were measured values from Kung et al. (2000a). The solid lines are the best-fitted breakthrough curves based on pore spectra with parameters shown in Table 3.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Normalized tracer mass flux breakthrough patterns. The open symbols were measured from the second irrigation event. The solid lines are the best-fitted breakthrough curves based on pore spectra with parameters shown in Table 4.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Normalized tracer mass flux breakthrough patterns. The open symbols were measured from the third irrigation event. The solid lines are the best-fitted breakthrough curves based on pore spectra with parameters shown in Table 5.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. The portions of normalized tracer mass flux breakthrough patterns that had tail slopes nearly equal to –3 on log-log scale. The suffix of each label indicates irrigation event (e.g., PFBA-1 indicates the tracer breakthrough curve from the first irrigation event).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Four hypothetical pore spectra to demonstrate how each parameter would alter the shape of a spectrum.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Pore spectra with parameters (Table 3) based on best fit of four sequentially applied tracers mass flux breakthrough patterns from Kung et al. (2000a).

 

Figure 7
Figure 7
View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. The regression relationships among the six parameters of pore spectra in Tables 3Go through 5. Figure 7A indicates that {alpha} is linearly related to the time when a tracer was applied. Figures 7B, 7C, and 7D show that the other five parameters are related to {alpha}. Arrows within Fig. 7B represent data acquired at 4.4 mm h–1 steady-state infiltration (Kung et al., 2005).

 

Figure 8
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Volumetric water flux of pores with spectra shown in Fig. 6.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Pore spectra with parameters (Table 4) based on best fit of four tracers mass flux breakthrough patterns from the second irrigation event. Bromide #1 (broken line) is the pore spectrum of bromide from Fig. 6.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Pore spectra with parameters (Table 5) based on best fit of four tracers mass flux breakthrough patterns from the third irrigation event. Bromide #1 (broken line) is the pore spectrum of bromide from Fig. 6.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Tile flow and concentration breakthrough patterns of four tracers and nitrate from Kung et al. (2000a).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.