VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 October 2006
Published in Vadose Zone J 5:1129-1142 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0015
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-H.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wu, Y.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Flow
Right arrow Fractured Rock
Right arrow Vadose Zone Risk Assessment

Estimating Large-Scale Fracture Permeability of Unsaturated Rock Using Barometric Pressure Data

Yu-Shu Wu, Keni Zhang* and Hui-Hai Liu

Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab., 1 Cyclotron Rd., Berkeley, CA 94720

Figure 1
View larger version (47K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic showing typical vertical profiles of hydrogeological layers and units, as well as the conceptualized barometric pressure signals within a typical east–west cross section of the unsaturated zone flow model domain (see Fig. 2 for the cross-section location).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (59K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Plan view of the three-dimensional model domain, showing model boundary, horizontal grid layer, major fault locations, and selected borehole locations.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Pneumatic pressure data from Borehole NRG-7a for typical pneumatic pressure responses at the site. Data from sensors located in the middle TSw, upper TSw, PTn, and TCw geological layers, and land surface are shown.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (66K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Plan view of net infiltration distributed over the three-dimensional model domain of the present-day mean infiltration, used for gas flow analysis.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (7K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Estimated F ratio as a function of factor d. The F ratio is determined as the ratio of the calculated F value to the F value for the gas pressure signal.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Comparison between simulated (broken line) and observed pneumatic gas-pressure data at Borehole SD-12, obtained though one-dimensional model inversion (subunits of the Tpcp and Tpbt2 are located within the TCw and PTn, respectively, while Tptrn and Tptpll correspond to upper and lower portions of the TSw, respectively).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Comparison of simulated and observed gas pressures at Borehole SD-12 during a 60-d period, using simulation results with and without three-dimensional calibration.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Comparison of simulated and observed gas pressures at Borehole SD-7 over a 60-d period, with three-dimensional calibration.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Comparison of simulated and observed gas pressures at Borehole SD-12 over a 60-d period, with three-dimensional calibration.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Comparison of simulated and observed gas pressures at Borehole UZ-7a over a 60-d period, with three-dimensional calibration.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.