VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 November 2006
Published in Vadose Zone J 5:1287-1292 (2006)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0098c
© 2006 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, W. D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, W. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Methods/Instrumentation

Tension Infiltrometer Measurements

Implications of Pressure Head Offset due to Contact Sand

W. D. Reynolds*

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Greenhouse and Processing Crops Research Centre, 2585 County Road 20, Harrow, ON, Canada N0R 1G0

Figure 1
View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic of the tension infiltrometer (TI) including water supply tube, infiltration disk or plate, contact sand layer, and retaining ring; Tcs and a are the thickness and radius of the contact sand layer, respectively.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dependence of pressure head offset on flux density out of the tension infiltrometer, q(h0) (Eq. [6a]); Kcs and Tcs are the field-saturated (rewet) hydraulic conductivity and thickness, respectively, of the contact sand layer.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Dependence of pressure head offset on the thickness of the contact sand layer (Eq. [6b]). The diamonds are flux density, q(h0), = 0.004 cm s–1 < field-saturated (rewet) hydraulic conductivity of the contact sand layer, Kcs; the squares are q(h0) = 0.016 cm s–1 > Kcs; and the circles are q(h0) = 0.01 cm s–1 = Kcs.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Dependence of pressure head offset on the field-saturated (rewet) hydraulic conductivity of the contact sand layer, Kcs (Eq. [6c]); q(h0) parameter is the flux density out of the tension infiltrometer and Tcs is the thickness of the contact sand layer.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Impacts of pressure head offset ({Delta}h = hsh0) due to contact sand on tension infiltrometer (TI) calculations of: (a) near-saturated hydraulic conductivity, K(h); (b) sorptive number, {alpha}*(h); (c) flow-weighted mean pore diameter, D(h); and (d) number of flow-weighted mean pores per unit area, N(h). Plots using soil surface pressure head, hs, are corrected for offset, while plots using TI membrane pressure head, h0, are not.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the Soil Science Society of America.