VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 November 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:913-924 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0174
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ward, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ward, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, Z. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hydraulic Conductivity/Relative Permeability
Right arrow Water Retention/Capillary Pressure
Right arrow Inverse Procedures/Parameter Estimation

Effective Hydraulic Properties Determined from Transient Unsaturated Flow in Anisotropic Soils

Andy L. Ward* and Z. Fred Zhang

Pacific Northwest National Lab., Richland, WA 99352

Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Schematic of probe installations perpendicular to the line source. Each probe consists of a twin-rod time domain reflectometry (TDR) probe with a 5-cm inter-rod spacing. Probes are spaced 0.5 m apart parallel to the long axis of the trench and 15 m perpendicular to the long axis.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Layout of experimental plot showing locations of vertical time domain reflectometry (TDR) probes and access tubes. The 2-m wide clastic dike is centered approximately 10 m along the transect.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. The composite scaled sensitivity (CSS) ratio ({eta}) of the hydraulic parameters: {theta}s, saturated water content; Ksh, horizontal saturated hydraulic conductivity; Ksv, vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity; {alpha}, inverse capillary length; n, van Genuchten shape parameter; Lh, horizontal connectivity.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. The spatial variability of the soil hydraulic property of the Army Loop Road site, Hanford. (a) horizontal saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksh), (b) vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksv), (c) inverse capillary length ({alpha}), (d) van Genuchten shape parameter (n), (e) horizontal connectivity (Lh), and (f) saturated water content ({theta}s). Symbols: local parameter values; dashed line: geometric mean; solid line: arithmetic mean

 

Figure 5
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Fractile diagrams for fitted parameters and their log transforms: (a) saturated water content ({theta}s), (b) vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksv), (c) horizontal saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksh), (d) inverse capillary length ({alpha}), (e) van Genuchten shape parameter (n); and (f) horizontal connectivity (Lh).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Semivariograms of hydraulic parameters of the Army Loop Road site at the Hanford Site: (a) horizontal saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksh), (b) vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksv), (c) inverse capillary length ({alpha}), (d) van Genuchten shape parameter (n); (e) saturated water content ({theta}s), and (f) horizontal connectivity (Lh).

 

Figure 7
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. The unsaturated hydraulic conductivities at the horizontal and vertical directions of the sandy soil at the Army Loop Road site, Hanford.

 

Figure 8
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 8. Saturation-dependent soil anisotropy coefficient of hydraulic conductivity of the sandy soil at the Army Loop Road site, Hanford.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 9. Schematic of the discrepancy of the flow direction (q) and the decreasing hydraulic gradient direction (g) in an anisotropic soil; h = horizontal; v = vertical.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.