VZJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 November 2007
Published in Vadose Zone J 6:935-945 (2007)
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2006.0176
© 2007 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khaleel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kristofzski, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Khaleel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kristofzski, J. G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Khaleel, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kristofzski, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Effective Parameters
Right arrow Variably Saturated Fluid Flow
Right arrow Infiltration

Impact Assessment of Existing Vadose Zone Contamination at the Hanford Site SX Tank Farm

Raziuddin Khaleela,*, Mark D. Whiteb, Martinus Oostromb, Marcus I. Woodc, Frederick M. Mannd and John G. Kristofzskid

a Fluor Government Group, P.O. Box 1050, Richland, WA 99352
b Pacific Northwest National Lab., P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
c Fluor Hanford, Inc., P.O. Box 1000, Richland, WA 99352
d CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., P.O. Box 1500, Richland, WA 99352


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Location map of single-shell tank Waste Management Area (WMA) S-SX and surrounding facilities in the 200 West Area, Hanford Site, Washington State.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. 241-SX tank farm under construction.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Geologic cross-section through tank row SX-107, SX-108, and SX-109. Depths and distances are shown in feet (ft) because of its usage at the Hanford Site. (bgs, below ground surface.)

 

Figure 4
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 4. Technetium-99/(nitrate + nitrite) ratios for Waste Management Area (WMA) S-SX network wells (the ratios highlighted in green and red). The technetium-99/(nitrate + nitrite) ratios for tanks SX-108 and SX-115 are 0.43 and 0.42 pCi µg–1, respectively. All well numbers are prefixed by 299-. RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 5. Vadose zone contamination for cesium-137, technetium-99, and sodium near tank SX-108 (after Serne et al., 2001a). A composite sample is obtained by combining two adjacent sleeves of the borehole liner. Depths are shown in feet (ft) because of its usage at the Hanford Site.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 6. Progression of saturation profile at year (a) 2000, (b) 2050, (c) 2540, and (d) 3000. Depths and distances are shown in feet (ft) because of its usage at the Hanford Site. (bgs, below ground surface.)

 

Figure 7
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 7. Progression of technetium-99 distribution at year (a) 2000, (b) 2050, (c) 2540, and (d) 3000. Depths and distances are shown in feet (ft) because of its usage at the Hanford Site. (bgs, below ground surface.)

 

Figure 8
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 8. Simulated flux versus time at the water table for the base case with no interim barrier.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 9. Simulated breakthrough curve for technetium-99 at the tank farm fenceline for the base case with no interim barrier.

 

Figure 10
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 10. Simulated flux versus time at the water table for the interim barrier case.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 11. Simulated breakthrough curve for technetium-99 at the tank farm fenceline for the interim barrier case.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 12. Simulated breakthrough curves for technetium-99 at the tank farm fenceline for various recharge estimates.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the Soil Science Society of America.