VZJ sign up for citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.



Fig. 6. Photomosaic and projected vertical fault map for the Crucifix site. (A) Exposure of west-dipping normal fault that offsets thinly bedded, highly porous and nonwelded, pumice-rich hybrid to streaky fallout tephra deposits (Wilson and Hildreth, 1998) interbedded with minor thin ignimbrite sequences pf the Crucifix site. Conjugate normal faults and numerous centimeter-scale displacement faults occur within the footwall damage zone. Ferrill et al. (2000) suggested these faults formed by sequential rather than simultaneous slip. (B) We estimated a minimum offset of 8 m from measurements along the Crucifix fault. The hanging wall damage zone extends about 5 m to the west, whereas the footwall damage zone extends about 10 m to the east. Fault core is heterogeneous and is filled with calcite and/or coated with clay, or consists of a comminuted gouge material with abundant pumice clasts (Fig. 8). Vertical fractures are closely spaced in the hanging wall and typically get deflected as they intersect less-welded and/or coarser pumice-rich layers. Subsidiary fractures are open or have millimeter to 1-cm-thick calcite and silica coatings. Numbers indicate sample locations for X-ray diffraction and thin-section analyses.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome