VZJ sign up for citetrack
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 8


FIG. 8. Comparison of quasi-steady-state microgravity drainage and wetting water retention data with steady-state 1-g porous media water retention curves for Turface. In (a) measurements in a 2- cm-tall sample with water contents shown as average sample values determined from pumped volumes are shown. Matric potentials were measured at z = 0.5 and 1 cm. Measurements using a 4-cm-tall sample with water contents shown as TDR measurements are depicted in (b) and (c), where water contents were measured at z = 1 cm (bottom) and z = 3 cm (top), respectively. The solid lines are predicted 1-g retention curves (upper = drainage, lower = wetting). Dashed or dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence interval for the 1-g retention curves.





Right arrow Return to article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome